From a technical point of view, intercultural mediation is nothing more than a composition of the principles of mediation and the intercultural components of the parties or the cultural location of the conflict. Nevertheless, the methodology for a mediator in intercultural relations is quite different than the regular intra-cultural conflict. Today’s intercultural conflict resolution is framed by the effects of migration, globalization and internet. This paper/workshop will start by briefly recalling the basic principles and phases of mediation in order to provide the starting point for the intercultural take. This refresher will lead into a basic framework of terminology leading the interculturally active mediator into his dispute resolution design, such as the definition of conflict resolution, active listening, etc. The second part of the presentation will present two practical examples on international mediation. At first, international mediation in African civil wars will be used to develop a framework of 6 principles of mediation in intra-state conflict, such as: mediators must not be partisan; the parties must consent to the mediation and the appointment of the mediator; conflict cannot be resolved quickly or easily; the parties must own the settlement; mediators must be flexible; and mediators must not apply punitive measures. Hence, this development focuses on the mediator’s strategy and tactics as variables that enhance or diminish the prospect of success. Both substantive and emotional dimensions need to be addressed if the conflict is to be resolved.
For more, please visit the American Conflict Resolution Annual Conference in New York City from June 26th - 27th, 2008, http://www.acrnet.org
Monday, March 24, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment